Touch and Misinformation

A few weeks ago there was a heated discussion on my facebook profile.  I’d posted an article about pick up artists (PUAs) – specifically, about reasons not to buy into ‘the game’ – and a number of men posted to say that there are some good things about the book.  It made them less socially awkward and aware of the way that touch escalates in a beginning relationship, making their dating lives more successful.

I believe the advice given by ‘the game’ on escalating touch is to start with less intimate forms of touch and, over time, escalate to more intimate forms of touch.  This is supposed to make the touch feel natural and the woman feel more comfortable with you.

I’m not sure how most women feel about this kind of touch.  PUAs find that it ‘works’ enough of the time to be worth repeating.  But what does ‘works’ mean for the woman?  Does she actually feel more intimate, or does the continual pushing towards physical intimacy awaken cultural conditioning to submission?  I’m tempted to go with the latter.  I’m tempted to say, ‘men, be careful, you may be stimulating submission rather than desire’.

But it doesn’t ‘work’ on every woman.  For those of us who find it a turn off or a sign of further creepy things to come, it can be the reason the gentleman doesn’t hear from us again.  Men following this pattern of touch may scare away some of the most psychologically balanced prospects, so I think it’s fair to call this aspect of ‘the game’ misinformation that can sometimes backfire on a man.  (And if he achieves submission rather than desire in other women, again it’s a case of misinformation.)

I have to agree with Game proponents that there is a progression of touch.  But I’d like to propose that that progression must take place reciprocally rather than unilaterally if you’re interested in developing a mutual relationship.  If he ‘accidentally’ bumps into her, let her ‘accidentally’ bump into him, or if he touches his arm, wait until she touches his, before he progresses to the next level on the touch hierarchy.

In this way you ensure that the touch is mutually desired,  non-submissive (she’s actively moving things forward with you), and non-creepy (you won’t scare away the same girls).  On the other hand, it’s possible that things won’t move forward as quickly or at all because she won’t touch you back.  You may regret things not moving forward, but comfort yourself with the reminder that she wasn’t ready for things to progress, or doesn’t want them to progress – in which case, it’s a good thing that you didn’t move forward.

That was 18 minutes, no second guessing.  Pushing publish.

Advertisements

One thought on “Touch and Misinformation

  1. True reciprocity is a beautiful thing, but it requires precommitment on the part of both parties, which is why it’s so rare. It requires deliberately burning certain bridges before you even encounter another (i.e. the prospect of retreating to a submissive relationship, etc.). How many of us are emotionally balanced enough to cut off our prospects for such things from the get-go? And does doing so prematurely in the grand scheme of one’s life not point to other issues, a la ideological ones?

    I would posit a different hierarchy, not based on touch, not even relating to touch per se: Demonstrate emotional balance (easier said than done), Express the desire for reciprocity and nothing less or other than that (easier than the former), Demonstrate specialization (in other words, robust masculinity or femininity as the case may be). You won’t be writing books about your many conquests, but then you won’t be writing books about how to escape from wicked culture and create your own Christendom either (i.e. So Much More than two-dimensional Relationships).

    It all comes down to how you define success, doesn’t it? Thanks for sharing what you wrote. I like the concept of your blog.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s